Sea Turtles & Natal Homing

It's well known that sea turtles and some other aquatic animals exhibit what is called "natal homing," where adults return to locations at or near their birthplace to reproduce. Many descriptions of natal homing would have you believe that every turtle returns to the exact beach or even the exact spot where they were born, but in practice this sort of precision is uncommon. In most cases, sea turtles return to a geolocation near their birthplace, but this may be the next beach, the next county, or even the next state.

Exactly how sea turtles engage in natal homing is still being studied, but evidence suggests that geomagnetic imprinting, a process by which animals use magnetoreception to detect and remember the geomagnetic signature of important locations such as their natal beach or foraging grounds. Since Earth's magnetic fields are not static, the signatures that the turtles are looking for may shift during the decade-long period where juveniles are living in open ocean currents. These variations impact where the turtle actually returns to and also impact nesting site densities, as more turtles will return to places where magnetic lines converge. That is, geomagnetic imprinting draws turtles to beaches with similar signatures to their home beach, even if it's not their exact home beach. As such, locations with similar magnetic field signatures are a better predictor of genetic similarity between turtles than are the distances between nesting areas.

It is also possible that additional cues are used for greater precision once the turtle locates the general geomagnetic region. While these additional cues are not well understood in sea turtles, other aquatic animals that engage in long oceanic migrations use similar tactics. As an example, salmon are known to use olfactory cues to pinpoint their home stream.

The loggerhead turtle population is separated into subpopulations that vary genetically. Turtles born in our region that make it to adulthood generally nest in areas that are part of the Northern Recovery Unit, which encompasses GA, SC, and NC. If you look at DNA records for some turtles, you will note that they stick to nesting on Seabrook, Kiawah and Edisto beaches. Does this mean they were born on one of these three beaches? Maybe, but not necessarily. In addition to natal homing, sea turtles also exhibit what is called "nesting site fidelity," which is when a mother returns to a preferred nesting beach for multiple nests and possibly multiple nesting seasons. While this beach isn't necessarily the turtle's birthplace, it becomes its adoptive home for the purposes of nesting time and time again, which is every bit as cool as precise natal homing!

The following is a good explainer on how geomagnetic imprinting associated with natal homing works:

https://lohmannlab.web.unc.edu/geomagnetic-imprinting/

This report discusses the evidence to support geomagnetic imprinting in sea turtles and how variations in the Earth's magnetic field impact nesting site densities:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982214016388

Fun Fact: A mama that nested on Seabrook Island in 2016 also nested 315 miles up the coast in Cape Hatteras in the same year! This is the farthest distance between nests for a Seabrook mama since DNA records started being kept!

Nest 55

Zone 4 walkers Carol Ann Hoffman, Andrea Daley and Sue Alfiero-Bavasso called with a crawl near Peg #2 with a body pit in a nice location far enough up the dune. They were sure there was a nest there and they were right! Jane Magioncalda and Sandy MacCoss responded and quickly found Nest 55 which was able to be left in situ.

IMG_1286.jpg

Nest 53 & 54

Zone 4 walkers JoAnne Lewis, Gail Koornick and Wendy Holschuh called with a crawl past the bird sanctuary towards the spit. Mike Vinson responded and found Nest 53. The 94 eggs were moved near peg #4.

IMG_5375.jpg
2021-06-30 10_00_18-Turtle Patrol Status - Wednesday June 30 - hello@siturtlepatrol.com - Seabrook I.png

Zone 2 walkers Paula Baram, Charlie Faught, and Heather Fife, along with Charlie's grandchildren, texted with a crawl going up the same walkway as Nest 51. Sandy MacCoss and Jane Magioncalda responded and found Nest 54, which also had 94 eggs. The nest was moved to a safer location on the zone.

Nests 49, 50, 51 and 52

After trying hard the last two days with a total of 15 false crawls, the mamas were finally successful today. We have 4 new nests and only 1 false crawl!

The fun started early when walkers Bill and Linda Nelson, Pat Tamasy and Tory Kindley called with two crawls, one of which looked promising. Judy Morr and Lesley Gore found nest 49 near boardwalk 3 with 84 eggs and one spacer. They relocated the nest to a higher location.

imagejpeg_0(7).jpg

Pam Salvestrini, Ruby Jenkins, Lynda Zegers and Mary Van Deusen then called with a crawl past the bird nesting area on zone 4. Mike Vinson responded and located nest 52 which was also relocated to a safer location. This nest had 123 eggs.

IMG_5371.jpg

The zone 2 walkers, Marnie Ellis and Vicky and Bob Becker, along with some visiting family members called with two promising crawls. Jane Magioncalda and Sandy MacCoss probed one area and located nest 51 which was left in situ. Judy Morr and Lesley Gore probed an area up in the rocks just north of the Club and found nest 50 with 134 eggs which was relocated further down the beach.

Nests 47 & 48

Mark & Valerie Doane, Susan Ferland, and the Carter family called in a crawl on Zone 3. Mark and Valerie stayed and probed and found nest #47, which was in a nice spot so it was left in situ.

IMG_2072.jpg

Karen Sewell and Kevin and Suzanne Boyle called in a crawl located in front of the second house north of the club. Joshua Shilko was the responding prober and found nest #48 with 108 eggs, which were relocated to a safer location.

While we ended up with two new nests today, there were so many false crawls that some of them actually overlapped one another. The image below shows 2 of today’s 6 false crawls!

PXL_20210627_114229032.jpg